Enterprise GRC vs. SimpAudit by BSC Global: Feature Comparison

Introduction GRC vs SimpAudit

GRC vs SimpAudit: The debate between traditional enterprise GRC and SimpAudit by BSC Global has become increasingly important for organizations managing ERP systems. While traditional GRC remains the legacy standard, SimpAudit has fundamentally changed the cost-benefit calculation.

This comprehensive feature comparison reveals why organizations are switching from traditional solutions to SimpAudit.

Executive Summary: The Comparison at a Glance

SimpAudit Wins On:

  • Implementation speed (2-4 weeks vs. 6-12 months)
  • Total cost of ownership (70% lower)
  • Real-time monitoring capabilities
  • User adoption rates (90%+ vs. 60%)
  • Risk library comprehensiveness (2,000+ vs. 800+)
  • Time-to-first-finding (days vs. weeks)

Traditional GRC Retains Advantages In:

  • Enterprise-wide compliance management across all modules
  • Deep customization for complex organizational structures
  • Integration with broader ecosystem solutions
  • Legacy system compatibility

Feature-by-Feature Deep Dive

1. IMPLEMENTATION AND DEPLOYMENT

Traditional GRC Implementation

Timeline: 6-12 months

Team Requirements:

  • Full-time specialist consultants
  • Part-time internal technical teams (2-3 people)
  • Compliance/audit team for requirements definition
  • Change management resources

Process:

  • Phase 1 (Weeks 1-4): Discovery, system analysis, requirements gathering
  • Phase 2 (Weeks 5-12): Configuration, customization, risk rule creation
  • Phase 3 (Weeks 13-20): Integration with system stacks
  • Phase 4 (Weeks 21-28): Testing, data validation, remediation of findings
  • Phase 5 (Weeks 29+): Training, go-live cutover, stabilization

Cost Structure:

  • Licensing (Year 1): High tier
  • Consulting/Implementation: High tier
  • Infrastructure/Hardware: Moderate tier
  • Training: Moderate tier
  • Year 1 Total: $330,000-$765,000 range

Key Challenges:

  • Requires extensive programming language knowledge for customization
  • Integration with multiple system components
  • Data migration from legacy systems
  • High organizational change management burden
  • Delayed ROI (18-24 months typical)

SimpAudit by BSC Global Implementation

Timeline: 2-4 weeks

Team Requirements:

  • BSC Global implementation specialist (provided by vendor)
  • Part-time technical team (0.5 person)
  • Compliance/audit team for validation (2-3 people, part-time)

Process:

  • Week 1: System access configuration, user provisioning, risk library upload
  • Week 2: Risk rule customization for organization-specific requirements
  • Week 3: Testing, validation, user training completion
  • Week 4: Go-live, post-implementation support, optimization

Cost Structure:

  • Licensing (Year 1): Moderate tier
  • Implementation: Low tier
  • Infrastructure: $0 (cloud-native solution)
  • Training: Low tier
  • Year 1 Total: Moderate range

Key Advantages:

  • No programming language expertise required
  • Native interface familiar to ERP users
  • Immediate go-live readiness
  • ROI begins within first month
  • Continuous BSC Global support included

Cost-Benefit Analysis: Year 1-3

By Year 3:

  • Traditional GRC Total Cost: $500,000+ (implementation + 3 years licensing/support)
  • SimpAudit by BSC Global Total Cost: Moderate tier (significantly lower)
  • Savings: Substantial 3-year advantage

2. SEGREGATION OF DUTIES (SoD) MANAGEMENT

Traditional GRC SoD Capabilities:

  • Risk Library: 800+ pre-configured risks (requires customization for organization-specific needs)
  • Risk Identification: Batch processing (typically daily runs)
  • Rules Engine: Requires programming expertise for customization
  • Remediation: Identifies conflicts with limited automated suggestions
  • Reporting: Standard reports available; custom reporting requires development

SimpAudit SoD Capabilities:

  • Risk Library: 2,000+ pre-configured risks (industry-specific and regulatory-aligned)
  • Risk Identification: Real-time monitoring (not batch)
  • Rules Engine: User-friendly graphical interface (no programming required)
  • Remediation: Automated suggestions for 80%+ of violations
  • Reporting: Interactive dashboards with drill-down capabilities

SoD Feature Comparison:

FeatureTraditional GRCSimpAudit by BSC Global
Pre-Built Risks800+2,000+
Risk Update FrequencyManualQuarterly (Automatic)
Rules CreationProgramming RequiredPoint-and-Click UI
Time to Custom Rule2-4 weeks5-15 minutes
Detection MethodBatch (Daily)Real-Time
Remediation AutomationManual80%+ Automated
Regulatory-Specific RulesRequires CustomizationPre-Built
Role OptimizationManual ProcessAlgorithmic (Automated)

3. IT GENERAL CONTROLS (ITGC) AUDIT

Traditional GRC ITGC Capabilities:

  • Access Management: User tracking, role assignments, limited non-ERP capabilities
  • Change Management: Transport request tracking, approval workflow enforcement
  • Backup & Recovery: Manual documentation and verification
  • Data Security: Limited data classification, manual identification
  • Configuration Monitoring: Profile parameter tracking with limited alerting

SimpAudit ITGC Capabilities:

  • Access Management: Real-time alerts, role tracking with impact analysis, supervised access monitoring
  • Change Management: Complete change log (unlimited history), automated tracking, exception alerts
  • Backup & Recovery: Automated testing, real-time monitoring, alerting for failures
  • Data Security: Sensitive transaction monitoring, automatic high-risk data access identification
  • Configuration Monitoring: Real-time parameter monitoring, unauthorized change detection

Key Difference: SimpAudit’s real-time, embedded architecture provides continuous control monitoring, while traditional solutions typically require manual configuration and periodic testing.

4. REAL-TIME MONITORING

Traditional GRC Monitoring:

  • Batch Processing: Daily scheduled analysis jobs, multi-hour lag
  • Alerting: Email notifications for pre-configured scenarios, manual filtering of notifications
  • Dashboards: Standard role-based dashboards with limited real-time updates
  • Performance: Reports taking minutes to hours to generate

SimpAudit Monitoring:

  • Continuous Analysis: Instant detection of every change, sub-second response time
  • Alerting: Real-time notifications, intelligent filtering reducing false positives
  • Dashboards: Interactive, drill-down enabled visualizations, mobile-accessible
  • Performance: Instant response to queries (< 1 second), zero impact to production systems

5. COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORK SUPPORT

Traditional GRC Framework Support:

  • Implementation Effort: 4-8 weeks to implement new compliance framework
  • Supported Frameworks: Limited to major frameworks; many require customization
  • Customization: Requires consultant-driven process

SimpAudit Framework Support:

  • Implementation Effort: 1-2 days to activate new compliance framework
  • Supported Frameworks: Pre-configured for all major frameworks
  • Customization: Automatic mapping to ERP transactions, zero customization required

6. USER EXPERIENCE AND ADOPTION

Traditional GRC User Experience:

  • Interface: Legacy interface or web-based portal
  • Learning Curve: Steep for non-technical users (4-8 weeks training typical)
  • Adoption Rates: 40-60% typical
  • Reporting: Technical users required for custom reporting

SimpAudit User Experience:

  • Interface: Modern design matching familiar ERP interface
  • Learning Curve: Minimal (2-3 hours typical onboarding)
  • Adoption Rates: 90%+ typical
  • Reporting: Non-technical users can create custom reports

User Experience Verdict: SimpAudit’s modern interface and minimal learning curve drive significantly higher adoption.

7. SCALABILITY AND PERFORMANCE

Traditional GRC Scalability:

  • User Scalability: Degradation beyond 500-1000 concurrent users
  • Data Volume: Performance issues with multi-year historical analysis
  • System Impact: Heavy resource consumption; may impact production systems

SimpAudit Scalability:

  • User Scalability: Unlimited concurrent users without degradation
  • Data Volume: Multi-year analysis without slowdown
  • System Impact: Zero impact to production systems

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

Year 1 Costs:

Traditional GRC:

  • License: High tier
  • Implementation Consulting: High tier
  • Infrastructure: Moderate tier
  • Training: Moderate tier
  • Year 1 Total: High range

SimpAudit by BSC Global:

  • License: Moderate tier
  • Implementation: Low tier
  • Infrastructure: $0 (cloud)
  • Training: Low tier
  • Year 1 Total: Moderate range

5-Year TCO:

Traditional GRC (Years 1-5):

  • 5-Year Total: $880,000+ range

SimpAudit by BSC Global (Years 1-5):

  • 5-Year Total: Significantly lower range

5-Year Advantage: SimpAudit delivers 60% cost reduction with superior capabilities

Conclusion: The Feature Comparison Verdict

SimpAudit by BSC Global wins decisively on:

  • Speed to deployment
  • Real-time monitoring
  • User adoption and experience
  • Total cost of ownership
  • Compliance framework breadth
  • Risk library comprehensiveness

Traditional GRC retains advantages in:

  • Enterprise-wide cross-module compliance
  • Deep customization capabilities
  • Legacy system compatibility

For the vast majority of organizations, SimpAudit delivers superior value through faster implementation, lower cost, better user adoption, and superior monitoring.

To Learn More Click on Image:

GRC vs. SimpAudit

Disclaimer:
The views and opinions expressed in this blog post are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of BSC GLOBAL. Any content provided by the author is of their personal opinion and does not constitute professional advice or represent the views of the company.